Financial Markets


In an increasingly digitized world, the term "bot," once used exclusively to identify software algorithms that automate actions on social media platforms, is morphing into a term used as an insult against humans. Researchers are recognizing a shift in the semantic terrain of the digital landscape, as language around technology is repurposed to denigrate the intelligence and credibility of individuals in online discourse, potentially marking a significant milestone in social dialects.

This shift in language and its possible implications have been deeply studied in recent research by Dennis Assenmacher at the Leibniz Institute for Social Sciences. Assenmacher's study, which analyzed over 22 million English-language tweets from between 2007 to December 2022, identified a noticeable change in how "bot" is used around 2017.

Prior to this point, automated accounts often called "bots" were easy to distinguish based on specific behavioral patterns. Bots were identified by their repetitive and unnatural online behavior, which was distinctly non-human. However, over the last five years, the term has been weaponized as an insult to delegitimize individuals' input and dismiss their cognitive abilities in online debates.

While Assenmacher's research does not conclusively determine the reason behind this linguistic shift, it does hint toward a potential political bias. The research suggests that left-leaning users are more likely to use "bot" as a term of disparagement against right-leaning users.

The emergence of this phenomenon might be attributable to the frequent media reports about right-wing bot networks suspected of steering major public events, such as the 2016 US Presidential elections. Yet, this remains a speculation, and confirmation through further research is vital.

The mutation of the term "bot" could signal a cripping blow to the robustness of algorithms seeking to identify bot presence on social platforms. As per Assenmacher's findings, the changing usage means these algorithms, based on patterns that are no longer prevailing, have their accuracy placed under increasing scrutiny.

This trend is a testament to how technology and its associated vocabulary can permeate different aspects of everyday life, including politics and language itself. Hence, it's necessary to adapt to these changes swiftly to ensure a realistic understanding of our linguistic landscape in the digital age.

Assenmacher's research underscores that not only has our interaction with technology evolved but how we conceptualize and use its terminology in our daily parlance has also changed drastically. As this trend continues, it could possibly fuel the evolution of a new digital dialect, one that shapes the future of social exchange and impacts the accuracy of technology designed to manage and improve digital ecosystems.